If it builds a dummy engine - then shouldn't a dummy engine respond gracefully to requests with something like "sorry I can't do anything useful", instead of spitting outa puke of error messages in response to "openssl engine -t capi"?
Regards, Uri Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 3, 2018, at 12:27, Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org> wrote: > > In message <62b8aa9b-d6d2-4f33-94c5-7bfe11e46...@akamai.com> on Mon, 3 Sep > 2018 13:56:41 +0000, "Salz, Rich" <rs...@akamai.com> said: > >>> Gotcha. In that case why does it get built on Mac? I.e., why >>> doesn’t the build process exclude it automatically? >> >> Beats me. It ends up being a zero-length object file, more or >> less. Perhaps Richard Levitte knows. > > We've made it conditional in the source file rather than the build > configuration, so on non-MSWindows platforms, it becomes a minimal > shared object with an entry point that fails unconditionally. > > We should obviously rethink that strategy... > > Cheers, > Richard > > -- > Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/ > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
