Re: Working inside X509_STORE_CTX using verification callbacks

[Matt Caswell]

On 25/09/2019 12:22, Simon Edwards wrote:
>     void X509_STORE_CTX_set0_error(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx, int error) {
> 
>        ctx->error = error;
> 
>    }

This one already exists:

void X509_STORE_CTX_set_error(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx, int err)
{
    ctx->error = err;
}

Other missing accessors could be added (and even backported to stable releases)
if there is a strong enough justification for wanting them.

Matt