Thanks. I managed to narrow this, it is not related to pss also if I pass pkcs1 I can reproduce. It has something to do with CMS_KEY_PARAM flag and add signer.
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 22:03 Thulasi Goriparthi < thulasi.goripar...@gmail.com> wrote: > With PSS, for the first signature, PSS alg ID and params are encoded > correctly, but not for the second signature(resign). > > 2542:d=7 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :S/MIME Capabilities > > 2553:d=7 hl=2 l= 108 cons: SET > > 2555:d=8 hl=2 l= 106 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2557:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2559:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :aes-256-cbc > > 2570:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2572:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :aes-192-cbc > > 2583:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2585:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :aes-128-cbc > > 2596:d=9 hl=2 l= 10 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2598:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :des-ede3-cbc > > 2608:d=9 hl=2 l= 14 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2610:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :rc2-cbc > > 2620:d=10 hl=2 l= 2 prim: INTEGER :80 > > 2624:d=9 hl=2 l= 13 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2626:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :rc2-cbc > > 2636:d=10 hl=2 l= 1 prim: INTEGER :40 > > 2639:d=9 hl=2 l= 7 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2641:d=10 hl=2 l= 5 prim: OBJECT :des-cbc > > 2648:d=9 hl=2 l= 13 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2650:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :rc2-cbc > > 2660:d=10 hl=2 l= 1 prim: INTEGER :28 > > 2663:d=5 hl=2 l= 0 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2665:d=5 hl=2 l= 0 prim: OCTET STRING > > 2667:d=4 hl=4 l= 723 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2671:d=5 hl=2 l= 1 prim: INTEGER :01 > > 2674:d=5 hl=3 l= 149 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2677:d=6 hl=3 l= 143 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2680:d=7 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SET > > 2682:d=8 hl=2 l= 9 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2684:d=9 hl=2 l= 3 prim: OBJECT :countryName > > 2689:d=9 hl=2 l= 2 prim: PRINTABLESTRING :IN > > 2693:d=7 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SET > ==multiple lines truncated== > > 2949:d=7 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :S/MIME Capabilities > > 2960:d=7 hl=2 l= 108 cons: SET > > 2962:d=8 hl=2 l= 106 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2964:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2966:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :aes-256-cbc > > 2977:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2979:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :aes-192-cbc > > 2990:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 2992:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :aes-128-cbc > > 3003:d=9 hl=2 l= 10 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3005:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :des-ede3-cbc > > 3015:d=9 hl=2 l= 14 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3017:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :rc2-cbc > > 3027:d=10 hl=2 l= 2 prim: INTEGER :80 > > 3031:d=9 hl=2 l= 13 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3033:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :rc2-cbc > > 3043:d=10 hl=2 l= 1 prim: INTEGER :40 > > 3046:d=9 hl=2 l= 7 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3048:d=10 hl=2 l= 5 prim: OBJECT :des-cbc > > 3055:d=9 hl=2 l= 13 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3057:d=10 hl=2 l= 8 prim: OBJECT :rc2-cbc > > 3067:d=10 hl=2 l= 1 prim: INTEGER :28 > > 3070:d=5 hl=2 l= 62 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3072:d=6 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :rsassaPss > > 3083:d=6 hl=2 l= 49 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3085:d=7 hl=2 l= 13 cons: cont [ 0 ] > > 3087:d=8 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3089:d=9 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :sha256 > > 3100:d=7 hl=2 l= 26 cons: cont [ 1 ] > > 3102:d=8 hl=2 l= 24 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3104:d=9 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :mgf1 > > 3115:d=9 hl=2 l= 11 cons: SEQUENCE > > 3117:d=10 hl=2 l= 9 prim: OBJECT :sha256 > > 3128:d=7 hl=2 l= 4 cons: cont [ 2 ] > > 3130:d=8 hl=2 l= 2 prim: INTEGER :DE > > 3134:d=5 hl=4 l= 256 prim: OCTET STRING [HEX > DUMP]:66C7A406905E0BEF3BE8A55B8BA05915020B6960BDE4700C3C3FB2F115FE5BA60B453EFF39BA37E4D16CA3A86582B3057D05875766BE99C51BC5BEC9CD1AAE3BEC34943160BB06784209F1A3773E07A101BA3E2231FDF85FAB91872A081E37410905A09DAF530600BF9099B054B1DF869826E864A95F5D55DAE84A0CEC43E52F6D13574E1EF66A4E3A65883788E265D6C174211ADBCFEA96A9DD186887BFE040D6D0B59547D8763157D322F0307D7AF31 > 23B0ECFB11E1E7EA228861F4363DBA8D478A7E44F1DEB77A3904FBD90CAA41E291A2E094ABCBD5134146FB1C0F42BC8D7B4829DEFEE7BACDFC024FB8B9FAF16F225EB3C96D866C535B2A06E83DCF007 > > > Thanks, > > Thulasi. > > > On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 00:40, Alon Bar-Lev <alon.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> Was about to write... I tested both 1.1 and master branches and result is >> the same. >> >> >> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 21:04 Thulasi Goriparthi < >> thulasi.goripar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I am able to reproduce this issue with 1.1.1j too. >>> >>> openssl version -a >>> >>> OpenSSL 1.1.1j 16 Feb 2021 >>> >>> built on: Fri Feb 19 18:56:06 2021 UTC >>> >>> platform: darwin64-x86_64-cc >>> >>> options: bn(64,64) rc4(16x,int) des(int) idea(int) blowfish(ptr) >>> >>> compiler: cc -fPIC -arch x86_64 -g -Wall -DL_ENDIAN -DOPENSSL_PIC >>> -DOPENSSL_CPUID_OBJ -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT >>> -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM >>> -DSHA512_ASM -DKECCAK1600_ASM -DRC4_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAESNI_ASM -DVPAES_ASM >>> -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM -DX25519_ASM -DPOLY1305_ASM -D_REENTRANT >>> -DNDEBUG >>> >>> OPENSSLDIR: "/usr/local/ssl" >>> >>> ENGINESDIR: "/usr/local/lib/engines-1.1" >>> >>> Seeding source: os-specific >>> >>> openssl cms -sign -in msg -text -signer cert1.pem -out 1.cms -keyopt >>> rsa_padding_mode:pss >>> >>> openssl cms -verify -in 1.cms -CAfile ca.pem >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain >>> >>> >>> hello world >>> >>> Verification successful >>> >>> openssl cms -resign -in 1.cms -signer cert2.pem -out 2.cms -keyopt >>> rsa_padding_mode:pss >>> >>> openssl cms -verify -in 2.cms -CAfile ca.pem >>> >>> Error reading S/MIME message >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D078079:asn1 encoding >>> routines:asn1_item_embed_d2i:field >>> missing:crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:425:Field=algorithm, Type=X509_ALGOR >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D08303A:asn1 encoding >>> routines:asn1_template_noexp_d2i:nested asn1 >>> error:crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:646:Field=signatureAlgorithm, >>> Type=CMS_SignerInfo >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D08303A:asn1 encoding >>> routines:asn1_template_noexp_d2i:nested asn1 >>> error:crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:615:Field=signerInfos, Type=CMS_SignedData >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D08303A:asn1 encoding >>> routines:asn1_template_noexp_d2i:nested asn1 >>> error:crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:646: >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D08403A:asn1 encoding >>> routines:asn1_template_ex_d2i:nested asn1 >>> error:crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:496:Field=d.signedData, Type=CMS_ContentInfo >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D0D106E:asn1 encoding routines:b64_read_asn1:decode >>> error:crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c:143: >>> >>> 4757167552:error:0D0D40CC:asn1 encoding routines:SMIME_read_ASN1:asn1 >>> sig parse error:crypto/asn1/asn_mime.c:451: >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Thulasi. >>> >>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 00:09, Viktor Dukhovni < >>> openssl-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:19:42PM +0530, Thulasi Goriparthi wrote: >>>> >>>> > I am able to reproduce this issue with 1.1.1i >>>> >>>> OpenSSL 1.1.1j has been released. Do you still see the problem with >>>> 1.1.1j? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Viktor. >>>> >>>
