Hello John, Thank you very much. It worked for us.
On Oct 16, 2017 4:47 PM, "John Dickinson" <m...@not.mn> wrote: > The "mitaka-eol" tag is available if you must use it. For completeness, I > must say please use later versions because they are better. The current > version of Swift (2.15.1) is 100% compatible with the Mitaka release > (2.7.1); ie clients that work with 2.7.1 will work with any later version, > and you can upgrade to the latest from 2.7.1 with no user downtime. > > (Version numbers pulled from https://wiki.openstack.org/ > wiki/Swift/version_map) > > --John > > > > > On 16 Oct 2017, at 16:33, Suraj Davanagere Basavaraj wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am Suraj, graduate student in Computer Engineering at San Jose State > > University. > > > > We had developed an encryption application using Swift-All-In-One > > architecture using stable/mitaka version during Spring 2017 as part of > our > > Non-thesis project phase 1. > > > > We are required to utilize the mitaka version to continue our project and > > application cannot be built on other versions of Openstack(like Newton, > > Ocata). We are unable to locate stable/mitaka branch in the upstream. > > > > Can you please let us know if there is an archived version of Openstack > > stable mitaka available. > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > Regards > > Suraj > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ > openstack > > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ > openstack >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
