Go for it. If I remember correctly, the existing ldappool feature offer us roughly 30% performance gain. If ldap3 can do the same or better that would be awesomer. I would also love to see some benchmark numbers between ldap3 and SSSD for read-only LDAP.
Guang -----Original Message----- From: Dimitri John Ledkov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 11:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [openstack-dev] Keystone, python3 and python-ldap Heya, Looking at keystone test requirements and the https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3 is there a plan for python-ldap & ldappool ? I see some mentions on the mailing list, but not a concrete solution. It seems to me that both python-ldap & ldappool could be replaced by ldap3 (previously known as python3-ldap, retro-fitted with python2.6+ support) https://ldap3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/welcome.html https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ldap3 It is licensed under LGPLv3, is that ok? Note that currently python-ldap license is quite iffy, and one of the optional deps is BSD-4-Clause which also not nice for everyone. Is it ok for me to work on transitioning to ldap3? -- Regards, Dimitri. https://clearlinux.org Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
