On Jun 18, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Luke Gorrie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 12 jun 2013 kl. 09:25 skrev Andre Pech: > >> As promised at the ml2 kickoff meeting last week, attached is our basic >> proposal for the ml2 mechanism driver API. > > Great, that is fast work! > >> After getting more familiar with the ml2 plugin code and looking at some of >> the other blueprints that are looking to make use of the MechanismDriver, >> we've instead gone with a more simple passthrough model using the existing >> plugin language of create_network / update_network / delete_network / >> create_port / update_port / delete_port. > > Is it intentional to exclude create_subnet / update_subnet / delete_subnet, > which are also a part of the QuantumPluginBaseV2 API? > > We have currently included Subnets in the data model that we want to > synchronize via our mechanism driver. So I would like to either include these > subnet-related callbacks in the MechanisnDriver API, or find a good reason to > eliminate Subnets from our data model so that they don't need to be > synchronized. > > Kyle, do you guys have the same issue with the OpenDaylight plugin? > We will want subnets for the ODL ML2 driver as well, so I think we'll want them here as well. Luke, maybe add these comments into the MechanismDriver review here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33201/6 Thanks, Kyle > Thanks very much Andre & Arista gang for hacking this up so quickly. I am > excited to get started on our mechanism driver. > > Cheers, > -Luke > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
