On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
> > > On 06/03/2013 02:14 PM, Jarret Raim wrote: > > On 6/3/13 10:24 AM, "Russell Bryant" <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On 06/02/2013 11:09 AM, Jarret Raim wrote: > >>> Both the Barbican (Key Management) and Meniscus (Logging) projects are > >>> moving down the path of using jsonschema for message validation. > >> > >> But please take a look at WSME. We've deprecated the home grown wsgi > >> code in Oslo. Instead, we're encouraging all projects to adopt similar > >> tooling (pecan and WSME) when developing new APIs. > > > > We aren't using the oslo stuff, we've been using Falcon up until now. It > > seems to me like there still isn't much consensus on the common wsgi > > question. There seem to be quite a few projects who aren't going to use > it > > or can't use it for some reason. I'm just pulling from memory so let me > > know if I've got the wrong impression. Do we have a list of which > projects > > are currently using Pecan? And which ones are planning on migrating? > > > Off the top of my head, I believe that in addition to ceilometer and > ironic are both using pecan, and someone else was talking about it for > their next api rev - but I honestly don't remember. I'm in the process of moving Cinder to pecan/wsme for I. I believe Quantum was also doing the same.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
