On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org>wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote: > > Does everything need to live under a program to get accounted for? > > Devstack isn't really a natural fit into the existing categories. Those > > of us that work on it tend to span a lot of categories anyway. I think > > as long as we acknowledge that it's an important project, and it's > > contributors will get counted as ATCs, where it fits in, or if it fits > > in to a program isn't all that important. > > Part of the rationale behind "programs" was to stop creating special > cases in the "official projects" list, and create some flexibility for > programs to add code repositories... So I would very much prefer if all > the contributions that grant ATC status fit somewhere in the taxonomy. > > Agreed with this and all of the discussion so far. > devstack could be its own program though, if the team caring for it is > really disjoint from Infrastructure and QA. > > I see DevStack under Infra and QA in its current role for the myriad projects. Dare I ask, what about TryStack? Infra seems to get a ton under it but that's where I'd place it if I had to state a preference. Anne > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev