On 07/01/2013 07:07 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:59 +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 07/01/2013 06:49 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:32 +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 07/01/2013 06:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
(Oslo is not an acronym)
ok.

can someone please clarify what the database status is in Oslo?
What apart from the oslo.config issue do you want clarified?
Boris had concerns about the slave database support. He mentioned that
the blueprint may be blocked -
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/db-slave-handle.
It's blocked in the sense that Nova can't yet use oslo.config because of
the aforementioned issue.

This patch
updates to oslo.config-1.2.0a2 - so it may address the blueprints
blocking item.

My concern here is about the process. I was under the assumption, and
may be wrong here, is that if code is approved in Oslo the is can be
consumed by other projects. Over the last few months we have had a large
amount of database issues in Neutron and moved to the Oslo DB code to
address these.
Yes, we've had (and continue to have) problems - no project has been
able to use new oslo.config features because of a series of python
packaging related issues.

If you're suggesting that e.g. the DB code in oslo-incubator should
avoid requiring oslo-config-1.2.0, that wouldn't help quantum much since
the dependency on 1.2.0 was added in order to enable behaviour that
quantum required.

The Oslo DB code requires oslo.config-1.2.0a2. This config version has supported for 'deprecated_opts' - which enabled the common DB code to support Neutron and Nova DB configuration variables.

I was not aware that that the slave blueprint was blocked because it was waiting for a specific config version (hopefully the Nova DB patch deals with as it uses the required config). My concern was that Oslo code was approved in one project (Neutron) and in another it raises question (Nova). Basically it would be nice to know if there are issues with the Oslo DB support and if so what needs to be done to address them.

Thanks
Gary


Cheers,
Mark.



_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to