On Thu, Jul 04 2013, Gordon Chung wrote: Hi Gordon,
> initially, we drafted this to be part of Ceilometer but as we've worked > through it, we've noticed it is applicable in multiple projects. during the > course of our discussions with Keystone developers to assure we were > recording the correct data for audit, we found that Keystone itself had a > blueprint to add notifications and log audit data for their APIs: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/notifications. I imagine the storage part can still go trough Ceilometer? > i thought i'd present this on the mailing list to gather feedback on the > idea of adopting CADF and discuss possibly its inclusion in Oslo so that > all the projects can use the same open standard when capturing events. I think it would be interesting to compile your need in term of potential notifications format evolution. The current format is very (and too?) free, and I imagine it could be a pain to handle the large amount of different notifications sent. It is already painful for Ceilometer, and I'm pretty sure it'll for such thing too. -- Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ; freelance consultant ;; http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
