On Monday, July 15, 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: > > On 07/15/2013 07:46 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > >>>> The OpenStack QA program starts with 2 git trees > >>>> * tempest - https://github.com/openstack/tempest > >>>> * grenade - https://github.com/openstack-dev/grenade > >>> > >>> I haven't read the full discussion on this so apologies if I am > >>> missing something, but why devstack is no part of this? > >> > >> Devstack falls somewhere between QA and Infrastructure... We raised > >> briefly the subject of where we should attach it during the initial > >> discussion on programs, then punted for later discussion. > >> > >> It falls in the same bucket as other "central" repositories like > >> openstack/requirements -- everyone ends up contributing to those so it's > >> difficult to attach them to any given program/team. > > > > Right, devstack's primary mission is still providing development > > environments to developers. We reuse it in QA and Infra, but it's kind > > of a different beast. > > > > So for now it just remains what it is, which I think is fine. I think > > it's good to be pragmatic about Programs and only fit the git trees that > > naturally fit into them, and just be really concerned that every git > > tree we carry has to be owned by a program. > > > > Sometimes we have useful code just because people are useful and doing > > good things for the community. I'd much rather let that bloom as is then > > spend a lot of time ensuring it fits into an existing program. > > I'd generally agree with that. The only issue with devstack is that > under the old project-based taxonomy it was classified as a "gating" > project and therefore granted ATC status to its contributors. Under the > new program-based taxonomy, if it's not adopted by a program then it > would fall off the "official" ATC scope.
How many people contribute to devstack that don't also contribute to some other ATC-granting project? > > That said, if nobody specific wants to own it it could also be > co-adopted by multiple programs (I'd say QA and Infra). That would close > that taxonomy change loophole as far as I am concerned... > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- -Dolph
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
