On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 16:07 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:14 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > >> On 07/15/2013 11:39 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > >>> DevStack plays multiple roles in the development process for OpenStack. > >> > >> Does it really make sense to be its own program? There was mention of > >> just making it a part of infra or QA. QA actually makes the most sense > >> to me, since devstack's primary use case is to make it easy to test > >> OpenStack. > > > > How about if the title of the program was 'Developer Tools'? > > > > Is devstack the only project which would fall into that bucket? > > The trick with programs is that it's not just about finding themes and > aggregate existing projects around them. At the heart of a program is an > existing team of people that works (well) together towards that common goal. > > Putting devstack in a "Developer tools" bucket only makes sense if the > team that cares about devstack also cares about those other "developer > tools". You don't really want to create an ugly stepchild effect by > adding random projects onto unwanting people's plates.
Yep, agree. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
