On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Doug Hellmann
<[email protected]="mailto:[email protected]";>> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Russell Bryant <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/02/2013 05:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> When we discussed this earlier, there was concern about moving to a
> completely new toolset for the new API in Havana because of other
> changes going on at the same time (something to do with extensions,
> IIRC). I agreed it made sense to stick with our current tools to avoid
> adding risk to the schedule. If that schedule has slipped into the next
> release, or if you feel there is time after all, then I would also
> prefer to go ahead with the general consensus reached at the Havana
> summit and use WSME.
The Nova v3 API schedule has slipped. A huge amount of progress has
been made, but it's going to be marked experimental in Havana. We're
going to wrap it up for Icehouse. So, there's another release cycle
available to work on the v3 API infrastructure.
Sounds good.
I think the critical bit will be if we can move to wsme with minimal to no
changes to the code for the extensions. Or at least a way that it can be done
in-place easily without breaking everything. Eg some transition phase where
wsme can support the wsgi api temporarily.
Otherwise we're in for either a giant patch which will be hard to merge or a
similar rather painful process to what we've had to do for the extension
framework changes in Havana.
Chris
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
