On 05/08/13 16:09, John Garbutt wrote: > On 5 August 2013 15:15, Anne Gentle<[email protected]> wrote: >> >On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:55 AM, John Garbutt<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>Given we seem to be leaning towards WSME: >>> >>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/012954.html >>> >> >>> >>Could we not try to make WSME give us the documentation we need? >>> >> >>> >>Not sure if its feasible, but it seems like there is a good start to >>> >>that already available: >>> >>https://wsme.readthedocs.org/en/latest/document.html >>> >> >> >John, this looks interesting, but I have reservations. Do you know if you >> >can suppress the SOAP and ExtDirect entries? > Sorry no idea, but we certainly would have to. >
While the topic of WSME is open - Has anyone actually tried using it? IMO it's just not ready. Simple things like returning a 404 are not currently supported[1]. I would be very cautious about assuming WSME can support anything we need when the absolute fundamentals of building a REST API are totally MIA. Thanks, Kiall [1]: https://bitbucket.org/cdevienne/wsme/issue/10/returning-404-or-basically-any-status-code _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
