Hi. I have increasing levels of concern about Havana database migrations and I want to beg for help, especially from nova core reviewers.
Specifically, I don't think its possible to land all of the database migrations people need before the 22 August proposal freeze. At the moment I see 10 patches competing for migration number 207 for example, and only one can take that number. That means the other nine will need to rebase and go through a re-review, which takes at least a day. Unfortunately we don't even do that well -- many of these patches sit around for several days before getting reviewed. So -- I'd like some help with reviewing database migrations please. The way I do these reviews is: - determine what migration number is currently the next one free from git (currently 208 because Dan just approved 207) [1]. - go to http://openstack.stillhq.com/ci/migrations/nova/<number>.html to see what patchsets have proposed a migration with that number. - review them - if you're super keen you can also check http://openstack.stillhq.com/ci for warnings about the migration first, but I generally keep an eye on that so its not absolutely required [2]. I would have brought this up at the meeting last week, but I decided to have a baby instead. I also apologize for my intermittent availability for the last ten weeks -- its been a complicated pregnancy and things should get back to normal within the next week or so. Thanks, Michael 1: that list is pretty empty at the moment because 207 only got taken, but if people reviewed 207 migrations WITHOUT APPROVING THEM then that would help have a high quality set of 208 proposals. 2: Joshua Hesketh is working on integrating the DB CI testing more closely into gerrit now, and should have something to show for this work for the Icehouse release. -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev