On 08/13/2013 07:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Matthew Farrellee wrote:
2. Candidate nomination -
a. anyone can list names in
https://etherpad.openstack.org/savanna-ptl-candidates-0
b. anyone mentioned during this week's IRC meeting
c. both (a) and (b)
- Current direction is to be inclusive and thus (c)
We do self-nomination (people who want to run nominate themselves)
because then you don't have to go through the painful step of
*confirming* candidates (people may not agree to run).
That's good to know and a nice modification.
3. Electorate -
a. all AUTHORS on the Savanna repositories
b. all committers (git log --author) on Savanna repos since Grizzly
release
c. all committers since Savanna inception
d. savanna-core members (currently 2 people)
e. committers w/ filter on number of commits or size of commits
- Current direction is to be broadly inclusive (not (d) or (e)) thus
(a), it is believed that (a) ~= (b) ~= (c).
If you want to make it "like OpenStack" it should be all Savanna recent
authors (last year), as given by git. Maybe the infra team could even
give you a list of emails for use in CIVS.
Also good to know. I'll mention this during out meeting when folks are
agreeing on the proposal options.
FYI, Savanna is < 1 yo and the AUTHORS file is automatically updated
when new commits come in.
4. Duration of election -
a. 1 week (from 15 Aug meeting to 22 Aug meeting)
5. Term -
a. effective immediately through next full OpenStack election cycle
(i.e. now until "I" release, 6 mo+)
b. effective immediately until min(6 mo, incubation)
c. effective immediately until end of incubation
- Current direction is any option that aligns with the standard
OpenStack election cycle
I think (a) would work well.
Thanks for the feedback!
Best,
matt
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
