Matthew Treinish wrote: > Also, if anyone has any input on what threshold they feel is good enough > for this I'd welcome any input on that. For example, do we want to ensure > a >= 1:1 match for job success? Or would something like 90% as stable as the > serial job be good enough considering the speed advantage. (The parallel runs > take about half as much time as a full serial run, the parallel job normally > finishes in ~25-30min) Since this affects almost every project I don't want to > define this threshold without input from everyone.
I guess 90% would be the limit where we'd start questioning it. 95% as stable then the speed improvement makes it definitely worth it IMHO. At 85% we would introduce way too many new false negatives in the tests, and those are painful to work around... -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
