On 19/08/13 00:34 -0700, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I have a number of things to say here:
1. Great work in getting the DB into the common and ironing out the
issues
+1
2. As far as I know only Neutron and Nova are making use of the common DB
code. Neutron has been using this since the beginning of H2 (this did not
resolve all of the issues that we had and we had) and Nova has just recently
upgraded to the latest DB code (this was a few weeks ago).
3. In general I like the idea of having a separate lib for this but have
a number of reservations regarding the timing and stability:
a. I do not think that this has been running long enough in Neutron and
Nova for us to give it a stamp of approval (the common CFG code was at least
one cycle as common code prior to moving into its own lib). I think that in
Neutron we still have a number of issues with load on the DB. I need to double
check on this.
Agreed. I'd also like to see other project migrated before pulling
oslo.db out from oslo-incubator
b. I think that the beginning of Icehouse is a good time. When we moved to
the CFG library there were a number of hickups and issues along the way. I
think that Mark (oslo PTL) can elaborate a little more on this. Timing is
essential.
+1
I'd also add that pulling oslo db into its own package means that
projects using Oslo's db code have to be migrated as well. I think
it's a bit late for that. The focus should be on making sure current
code is stable enough for the not-so-far release.
Thanks for the hard work!
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
