Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:18:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:53:25PM -0300, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> It would be more interesting to check how many blueprints are created >>> more than two weeks after the design summit. Those would be the late >>> blueprints (or the ones created as a tickbox), which escape the release >>> planning process. >> >> I'll look up the historic dates for each summit, and try to generate >> some stats based on blueprint creation date vs summit date + 2 weeks. > > Re-running using the summit date + 2 weeks shift things a little bit. > Here is the summary for 3 most recent series: > > Series: folsom all > Specs (Before Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000): 62 > Specs (After Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000): 115 > > Series: grizzly all > Specs (Before Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0000): 81 > Specs (After Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0000): 174 > > Series: havana all > Specs (Before Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000): 197 > Specs (After Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000): 273
Interesting, looks like we actually did a better job with havana, jumping from 31% to 42% of "planned blueprints". That may be Nova and Neutron PTLs enforcing more rules to retain their sanity. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
