On Aug 21, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Julien Danjou <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21 2013, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> IIUC, git sub-modules point to a specific revision of the external >> repository, right? > > Yes. > >> So would projects still have to explicitly update to newer versions of >> the incubator code by changing that sub-module reference? > > Yes. > >> With the copy process we have now it is possible to update only part of the >> incubator code in a project. Is that a feature we would want to retain if >> using sub-modules? > > We'd lose it indeed. > > OTOH, it seems _relatively_ dangerous to me to update part of > Oslo-incubator like we do, considering the possible dependencies between > files. > > My 2c, Keeping the same functionality would mean that each of the oslo-incubator directories would be its own submodule. Vish > > -- > Julien Danjou > -- Free Software hacker - independent consultant > -- http://julien.danjou.info > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
