On 27/08/13 23:13, Robert Collins wrote:
I think there is some confusion about implementation vs intent here :). Or at least I hope so. I wouldn't expect Nova's mission statement to talk about 'modelling virtual machines' : modelling is internal jargon, not a mission!
So, I don't really agree with either of those points. Nova, at its core, deals with virtual machines, while Heat deals with abstract representations of resources. Talking about models in the Heat mission statement seems about as out of place as talking about VMs would be in the Nova one. And "model" is not a term we use anywhere internally. It's not intended to be internal jargon (which would be one level of abstraction below Heat-the-service), it's intended to be at one level of abstraction _above_ Heat-the-service.
That said...
"Create a human and machine accessible service for managing the entire lifecycle of infrastructure and applications within OpenStack clouds."
Sounds good enough. - ZB _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
