+1 I meant to raise that myself when I saw some changes there the other day.
On 4 September 2013 15:52, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 09/04/2013 10:26 AM, Dan Smith wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As someone who has felt about as much pain as possible from the >>> dual-maintenance of the v2 and v3 API extensions, I felt compelled to >>> bring up one that I think we can drop. The baremetal extension was >>> ported to v3 API before (I think) the decision was made to make v3 >>> experimental for Havana. There are a couple of patches up for review >>> right now that make obligatory changes to one or both of the versions, >>> which is what made me think about this. >>> >>> Since Ironic is on the horizon and was originally slated to deprecate >>> the in-nova-tree baremetal support for Havana, and since v3 is only >>> experimental in Havana, I think we can drop the baremetal extension for >>> the v3 API for now. If Nova's baremetal support isn't ready for >>> deprecation by the time we're ready to promote the v3 API, we can >>> re-introduce it at that time. Until then, I propose we avoid carrying >>> it for a soon-to-be-deprecated feature. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> Sounds reasonable to me. Anyone else have a differing opinion about it? > > +1 > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
