Hi, I think that it has been a valuable learning experience and hopefully we'll be able to close the gaps regarding the API in I. Thanks for all of the reviews and inputs. Thanks Gary
On 9/6/13 10:57 PM, "Debojyoti Dutta" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1 Gary > >If this was allowed in H2 and not stopped due to the mandatory >requirement to use API objects (then), this feature would have >definitely seen the light of day (and we would have improved it to use >the objects/v3api anyway). This API leads to a bunch of new features >that make Openstack even better in terms of resource allocation, >scheduling, policies etc. Hence a little sad. > >Hopefully we will have better luck next time :) Thanks to all the >reviewers esp Chris Yeoh, Dan Smith, Alex Xu and Russell Bryant for >their time. Thanks Thierry for trying to help with the FFE! > >debo > >On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Gary Kotton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 9/6/13 5:07 PM, "Russell Bryant" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>On 09/06/2013 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>>> Debojyoti Dutta wrote: >>>>> As per my IRC chats with dansmith, russellb, this feature needs the >>>>> user auth checks (being taken care of in >>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1221396). >>>>> >>>>> Dan has some more comments .... >>>>> >>>>> Could we please do a FFE for this one .... has been waiting for a >>>>>long >>>>> time and we have done all that we were asked relatively quickly .... >>>>> in H2 it was gated by API object refactor. Most of the current >>>>> comments (pre last one by Dan) are due to >>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1221396 >>>> >>>> This sounds relatively self-contained and ready. If you can get it >>>> merged (with the additional bugfix) before the release meeting >>>>Tuesday, >>>> personally I'm fine with it. >>>> >>> >>>I originally was fine with a FFE for this. However, after some >>>discussion yesterday, it seems there are quite a few comments on the >>>review. There's more iterating to do on this, so I don't have a high >>>confidence that we can merge it in time. >>> >>>I would hate to grant the FFE, have you work super hard to iterate on >>>this quickly, and it still not make it in time. I think at this point >>>we should just defer to Icehouse to ensure that there is proper time to >>>do the updates and get good review on them. >> >> I am a little sad that this not been granted an FFE. We worked really >>hard >> on this. To be honest it was ready for review at the end of H2. I guess >> that our goal will now be to get this valuable feature in beginning of >>the >> Icehouse release. >> >> Thanks >> Gary >> >>> >>>NACK on the FFE. >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>-- >>>Russell Bryant >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > >-- >-Debo~ > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
