On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Michael Still <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Dan Wendlandt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Joe Gordon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Russell Bryant <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> On 09/20/2013 02:02 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > I couldn't agree more. In fact, the VMware team has been working hard to > > get a fully-automated CI infrastructure setup and integrated with > upstream > > Gerrit. We already run the tempest tests internally and have been > manually > > posting tempest results for some patches. I wouldn't want to speak for > the > > dev owner, but I think within a very short time (before Havana) you will > > begin seeing automated reports for tempest tests on top of vSphere > showing > > up on Gerrit. I agree that this will really help core reviewers gain > > confidence that not only does the code "look OK", but that it works well > > too. > > How are you doing this? Joshua Hesketh has been working on integrating > our internal DB CI tests into upstream zuul, so I wonder there are > synergies that can be harnessed here. > We're just using the standard stuff built by the OpenStack CI team for third-party testing: http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html Is that what you were asking, or am I misunderstanding? Btw, thanks again for your help reviewing vmwareapi driver changes. Dan > > Michael > > -- > Rackspace Australia > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
