I think everyone will have opinions :). I suggest proving it in keystone and then bringing in a larger audience; we've had discussions about graceful evolution for some time now but little concrete action - I think because we're too ambitious, and the costs that result are perceived to be too high.
+1 for doing it! -Rob On 16 October 2013 14:00, Morgan Fainberg <m...@metacloud.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com> > wrote: >> >> >> Making updates easier would be nice, and the abstract base class work >> should help with that. On the other hand, as a deployer who has had to >> rewrite our custom integration a few times in the past 6 months or so, I >> would also welcome some stability in the plugin APIs. I understand the need >> to provide flexibility and updated features for new REST APIs, but I hope we >> can find a way to migrate more smoothly or make newer features optional in >> the plugins themselves. >> > Agreed, the ABC changes that are slowing making their way in will most > assuredly help some. > >> >> DreamHost will have several developers at the summit; is there a session >> to talk about approaches for this that we should make sure to attend? >> > I do not believe there is currently a session slated for anything like this. > You could propose a session for this (or I could); obviously we would need > enough interest to make it worth committing a whole session to. Maybe > piggy-back this one onto another session already proposed? Maybe this > should be a broader-than-keystone-only topic? > --Morgan > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev