On 10/16/2013 02:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi there, > > It appears that in Debian, python-coverage provides the wrapper in > /usr/bin/python-coverage. I tried to push the current maintainer to > provide /usr/bin/coverage, but he doesn't agree. He believes that > "coverage" is just too generic to be squatted by the python-coverage > package. > > Robert Colins wrote that he sees it ok-ish if all of the OpenStack > projects makes it so that we could also use /usr/bin/python-coverage. > What is the view of others in the project? Could the path be checked, > and then used, so that it works in every cases? Of course, the goal > would be to avoid "by hand" patching in debian/patches whenever > possible, because this is a major pain. > > Your thoughts?
I agree, coverage is too generic. But I also see /usr/bin/coverage is used in Red Hat land too :( I've logged a request for /usr/bin/python-coverage to be used and to have coverage as a symlink for compat, but to be phased out over a certain period: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1020046 thanks, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev