Yes, if we can do that it will be perfect. How should we arrange this? I will arrive at the morning of 5th. Yi
On Monday, October 28, 2013, Erik Moe wrote: > > Hi Yamahata, > > yes, unconference sounds good. > > I agree that quantum-network-bundle-api is in the same area. I missed this > blueprint. > > /Erik > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Isaku Yamahata > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> Hi Erik and Li. >> Unconference at the next summit? >> >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:34:28PM -0700, >> beyounn <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> > Hi Erik, >> > >> > While we were discussing about the service VM framework, the trunk port >> > support was also mentioned. I think people do see the needs for it. >> > >> > I have seen someone have mentioned another BP >> > >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-network-bundle-apiin >> > your BP already. Maybe it is same as what you are doing. >> > >> > And the trunk port use case can also impact how the zone being >> constructed >> > in the fwaas context (when a firewall VM uses a trunk port to connect >> > multiple networks). The basic question is how we should present a trunk >> port >> > and the vlan on a trunk port to Neutron. >> > >> > >> > >> > Yi >> > >> > >> > >> > From: Erik Moe [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');>] >> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 1:56 PM >> > To: [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');> >> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN aware VMs >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi! >> > >> > We are looking into how to make it possible for tenant VMs to use VLAN >> > tagged traffic to connect to different Neutron networks. >> > >> > >> > >> > The VID on frames sent/received will determine which Neutron network the >> > frames are connected to. >> > >> > >> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vlan-aware-vms >> > >> > I would like to find others that also see the need for this kind of >> > functionality and would like to discuss this. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Erik >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> -- >> Isaku Yamahata <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', >> '[email protected]');> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > -- Android-x86 http://www.android-x86.org
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
