Its intentional. Cells is there to split up your nodes into more manageable chunks.
There are quite a few design summit sessions on looking into alternative approaches to our current scheduler. While I would love a single scheduler to make everyone happy, I am thinking we might end up with several scheduler, each with slightly different properties, and you pick one depending on what you want to do with your cloud. John On 31 October 2013 22:39, Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.ji...@intel.com> wrote: > I noticed several filters (AggregateMultiTenancyIsoaltion, ram_filter, > type_filter, AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter) have DB access in the > host_passes(). Some will even access for each invocation. > > Just curios if this is considered a performance issue? With a 10k nodes, 60 > VM per node, and 3 hours VM life cycle cloud, it will have more than 1 > million DB access per second. Not a small number IMHO. > > Thanks > --jyh > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev