Ilya Shakhat wrote: > Currently the grouping is two-layer: the higher is to split between > openstack-hosted and stackforge-hosted projects, the lower is to split > core, incubation, docs, etc. The grouping may be not so accurate since > it needs to comply with the latest changes in integrated / incubated > projects (bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/stackalytics/+bug/1244485). > > I see there's a need to have stats for official projects (more correctly > to say projects belonging to official > programs https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs), and separate that > stats from other openstack-hosted projects. > So will it work to have the grouping like that? > - Official OpenStack Projects > - core > - integrated > - incubated > - OpenStack complimentary projects (e.g. infra projects like jeepyb, gitdm) > - Stackforge projects (everything from github/stackforge)
I think the following objective groupings make sense: Official * Integrated (= commonly-released, server) projects (Nova, Swift... up to Trove) * Incubated (Marconi, Savanna...) * All projects from all official programs (includes client bindings like python-novaclient, openstack-infra/*, tempest, tripleO etc.) Stackforge * All stackforge "Core" at this point probably doesn't make sense, since depending on who you ask, or what reference text you look at, you'd get a different list. Just use "integrated" instead. "OpenStack complimentary projects" is also subjective and should be dropped in favor of the "All projects from all official programs" category. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
