+1 - with the level of interest among existing vendors I think this will help others who want to be API compatible with Solum (above and beyond normal benefits)
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > One of the most important aspects in the early stages of Solum development > will be the consensus building and stabilization of the Solum API > specification. A solid API spec aid in the speeding up the pace of innovation > in the Solum contributor community. > > One of the aspects of the Keystone development process that I think is a big > benefit is the separate source repository that stores the OpenStack Identity > API specifications: > > https://github.com/openstack/identity-api > > When new versions of the API specification are debated or new extensions are > proposed, patches are made to the specification markdown documents and > reviewed in the exact same manner that regular code is on the > https://review.openstack.org Gerrit site. Contributors are free to annotate > the proposed changes to the API specification in the same way that they would > make inline code comments on a regular code review. Here's an example for a > proposed change that I recently made: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54215/10 > > I'd like to propose that Solum do the same: have a separate source repository > for the API specification. > > Thoughts? > -jay > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
