Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2013-11-12 10:36:31 -0800: > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-11-12 10:01:06 -0800: > > During the freeze phase of Havana we got a ton of new contributors > > coming on board to Tempest, which was super cool. However it meant we > > had this new influx of negative tests (i.e. tests which push invalid > > parameters looking for error codes) which made us realize that human > > creation and review of negative tests really doesn't scale. David Kranz > > is working on a generative model for this now. > > > > Are there some notes or other source material we can follow to understand > this line of thinking? I don't agree or disagree with it, as I don't > really understand, so it would be helpful to have the problems enumerated > and the solution hypothesis stated. Thanks!
Thanks to all for explaining the motivations fully. I understand now, and agree with all of the points made (including how incredibly frustrating it is to come up with all of the conceptual ways to get errors back). _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
