On 11/11/2013 12:27 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/11/2013 12:09 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
What about something with attribution in the docs for the feature? Can
we play around with that a while? Attribution is going to have to be
incorporated better into the docs for the CC By licensing anyway. Any
thoughts on docs as placement for "This feature brought to you by
<insert rewarded upstreamer here>" We need to play with the words more.
Sponsored by brings up ickies for me, sounds like it turns others off
too. Let's be careful with wording and placement both.
This sounds like it could get really messy. Once a feature goes in, it
becomes a collaboration between many people over time. It sounds like
it would get into the same situation as our copyright headers in source
files (wildly incomplete).
Wildy inconsistent as well.
This also has a tendency to just recognize feature adds, and not common
work. Lack of or minimal contributions to common work by some
organizations is already a pretty big problem in various parts of OpenStack.
+10
-jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
