On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 17:24 +0000, Duncan Thomas wrote: > Random OSLO updates with no list of what changed, what got fixed etc > are unlikely to get review attention - doing such a review is > extremely difficult. I was -2ing them and asking for more info, but > they keep popping up. I'm really not sure what the best way of > updating from OSLO is, but this isn't it.
Best practice is to include a list of changes being synced, for example: https://review.openstack.org/54660 Every so often, we throw around ideas for automating the generation of this changes list - e.g. cinder would have the oslo-incubator commit ID for each module stored in a file in git to tell us when it was last synced. Mark. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
