On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > One more thing... > > I'm thinking about the "use case" for "Floating IPs" in a NAT-less IPv6 > OpenStack environment. > > > I can think in two "use cases" in a IPv6-Only Tenant Subnet: > > 1- the Floating IP might be used to allocate more IPv6 address for an > Instance (since there is no plans for NAT66, I believe it is not desired) > but, instead of allocating it from the "allocation pool", get it from the > tenant subnet directly. This way, the "IPv6 Floating IP" will appear within > the Instance it self, not at the L3 Namespace Router as it is with IPv4 today. > > 2- we can provide a IPv4 Floating IP address (for a IPv6-Only tenant) and the > L3 Namespace Router will do the NAT46. This way, the "old Internet" will be > able to seamless reach a IPv6-Only network. > > > What do you guys have in mind / roadmap?! > > Cheers! > Thiago > Hi Thiago:
An IPV6 subteam in Neutron was formed for the Icehouse release. The team will have weekly meetings in #openstack-meeting-alt on freenode Thursday's at 2100 UTV. See the meeting page here [1]. If you're planning to work on IPV6 in any form, it would be great to participate in these and help shape the IPV6 direction for Neutron. Thanks, and welcome aboard! Kyle [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam > > > On 19 November 2013 22:57, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Stackers! > > I'm Thiago and I'm here on dev list mostly to watch you guys... > > Nevertheless, I want to say that I would love to test in deep, the IPv6 > support in OpenStack IceHouse. > > At at glance, what I'm looking for is more or less specified here, as follows: _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
