Mark Washenberger wrote: > > My question is, is there a correct way to stage breaking changes in > > Gerrit? Has some other team already dealt with this problem? > > [...] > > It sounds like a case where we could use a feature branch. There have > been a number of them in the past when people wanted to incrementally > work on new features without affecting master, and at first glance > (haha) it sounds appropriate here. > > As a quick sidebar, what does a feature branch entail in today's parlance?
It can be created on request by release management members (or infra-core team). I /think/ that by default it would get tested against master in other branches. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev