On 25 November 2013 19:25, Joe Gordon <joe.gord...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> > wrote: >> >> I have a proposal - I think we should mark all recheck bugs critical, >> and the respective project PTLs should actively shop around amongst >> their contributors to get them fixed before other work: we should >> drive the known set of nondeterministic issues down to 0 and keep it >> there. > > > > Yes! In fact we are already working towards that. See > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/020048.html
Indeed I saw that thread - I think I'm proposing something slightly different, or perhaps 'gate blocking' needs clearing up. Which is - that once we have sufficient evidence to believe there is a nondeterministic bug in trunk, whether or not the gate is obviously suffering, we should consider it critical immediately. I don't think we need 24h action on such bugs at that stage - gate blocking zomg issues obviously do though! The goal here would be to drive the steady state of 'recheck needed' so low that most people never encounter it. And break the social pattern that has been building up. -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
