On 02/17/2017 12:01 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Dan Prince wrote:
And yes. We are all OpenStack developers in a sense. We want to align
things in the technical arena. But I think you'll also find that most
people more closely associate themselves to a team within OpenStack
than they perhaps do with the larger project. Many of us in TripleO
feel that way I think. This is a healthy thing, being part of a team.
Don't make us feel bad because of it by suggesting that uber OpenStack
graphics styling takes precedent.
I'd very much like to have a more clear picture of the number of
people who think of themselves primarily as "OpenStack developers"
or primarily as "$PROJECT developers".
I've always assumed that most people in the community™ thought of
themselves as the former but I'm realizing (in part because of what
Dan's said here) that's bias or solipsism on my part and I really
have no clue what the situation is.
Anyone have a clue?
I don't have a clue, and I don't personally think it matters. But I suspect the
latter is the majority. At least because very few contributors have a chance to
contribute to something OpenStack-wide, while many people get assigned to work
on a project or a few of them.
That being said, I don't believe that the "OpenStack vs $PROJECT" question is as
important as it may seem from this thread :)
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
