On Mon, Feb 13 2017, gordon chung wrote: > i assume this is a vendor specific solution. we don't/prefer not to > store drivers in Ceilometer. you can take a look at how powervm does > this[1]. they basically extend the existing interfaces we provide[2]. i > suspect you want to do something similar. if there's an interface > missing, feel free to propose it. > > for everything else, we detect pollsters to load via entry_points[3][4]. > i imagine you want to leverage that and add your own pollster in same > namespace for Ceilometer to pickup. > > lastly, the polling control is handled by polling.yaml and not the > pipeline.yaml[5] > > you're welcome to post your solution to ceilometer repo. just know, all > the driver specific code will be probably pushed outside the repo.
Also, if you need help to setup that repo, feel free to ping us on IRC or through this list. As gordon suggested, powervm is a good example. -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
