On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Thomas Morin <thomas.mo...@orange.com> wrote:
> Hi Anil, > > Tue Feb 21 2017 22:47:46 GMT-0500 (EST), Anil Venkata: > >> Currently arp_resonder can enabled only if l2pop is enabled. >> >> Can we have arp_responder feature enabled without l2pop(i.e Remove the >> dependency between arp_responder and l2_pop)? >> >> > I agree that it would be useful. > networking-bgpvpn ovs/bagpipe driver is relying on arp_responder, and > hence currently draws this dependency on l2pop (not an issue I find, but > still an artefact rather than a design decision). > > Also setup arp_responder on OVS integration bridge(and not on br-tun)? >> >> > While relevant, I think this is not possible until br-int allows to match > the network a packet belongs to (the ovsdb port tags don't let you do that > until the packet leaves br-int with a NORMAL action). > Ajo has told me yesterday that the OVS firewall driver uses registers > precisely to do that. Making this generic (and not specific to the OVS > firewall driver) would be a prerequisite before you can add ARP responder > rules in br-int. > > Thanks Thomas. Spoke to Ajo on this. He said we can follow above suggestion i.e do the same what firewall driver is doing in br-int, or wait till OVS flow extension is implemented(but this will take time as lack of resources) > I think this question (of where to put the ARP responder rules) also > relates to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320439/ . > > -Thomas > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
