On 26/11/13 10:57 -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: As crazy as it sounds, have you guys considered migrating to Nottingham's approach? It only sounds crazy because I have no idea how to "migrate" an unversioned endpoint :) Skimming through his proposal, it looks like it might actually be compatible with ours to include side by side? If so, we could support both for a couple releases before moving on.
This would be awesome. We'll still have to write a python library for it but that's something we could do as part of Marconi's client development and then move it to its own repo - or oslo - once it's ready.
Does this proposal have much traction outside the OpenStack community? (and how much traction does it have within the community already?)
It does. I don't have the exact numbers of users but I know for sure the work there is moving forward. A new version will be released soon, AFAIU. Cheers, FF -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
pgp5LOk44Ranp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
