Dean Troyer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well >> understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for >> those who want to monitor the overall health of the community, address >> issues with cross-project specs, or participate in so many projects it >> makes little sense to spend time filtering. > > Monday morning and the caffiene is just beginning to reach my brain, > but this seems counter-intuitive to me. I consider myself someone who > _does_ want to keep in touch with the majority of the community, and > breaking things into N additional mailing lists makes that harder, not > easier. I _do_ include core team updates, mascots, social meetings in > that set of things to pay a little attention to here, especially > around summit/PTG/Forum/etc times. > > I've seen a couple of descriptions of who this proposal is not > intended to address, who exactly is expected to benefit from more > mailing lists?
I'm not (yet) convinced that getting rid of 10% of ML messages (the ones that would go to the -business lists) is worth the hassle of setting up 50 new lists, have people subscribe to them, and have overworked PTL moderate them... Also from my experience moderating such a -business list (the openstack-tc list) I can say that it takes significant effort to avoid having general-interest discussions there (or to close them when they start from an innocent thread). Over those 50+ -business mailing-lists I'm pretty sure a few would diverge and use the convenience of isolated discussions without "outsiders" potentially chiming in. And they would be pretty hard to detect... -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev