Hi Julia, Thanks for asking!
I'm agnostic about whether the BFV meeting should use the same day/time as the ironic-neutron meeting was. As long as people who are/will be attending this meeting are fine with the date/time, I'm fine too :) I would actually prefer that the date/times are chosen to accommodate the folks that intend on attending those meetings. I'm concerned about keeping/having a 'generic' meeting time that doesn't work that well for the same folks all the time. If we 'set this in stone', new people may not feel like they could ask to change the day/time :-( I did not take any poll so I may be bringing something up that no one cares about. E.g., I'm totally fine with the proposed date/time but I don't know if I'll be attending this or future meetings :) --ruby From: Julia Kreger <juliaashleykre...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 9:42 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <email@example.com> Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting? Greetings fellow ironic humanoids! As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from Volume functionality in ironic over the past two years. Largely, in a slow incremental approach, which is in part due to how I perceived it to best fit into the existing priorities when the discussions started. During PTG there was quite the interest by multiple people to become involved and attempt to further Boot from Volume forward this cycle. I would like to move to having a weekly meeting with the focus of integrating this functionality into ironic, much like we did with the tighter neutron integration. I have two reasons for proposing a new meeting: * Detailed technical status updates and planning/co-ordination would need to take place. This would functionally be noise to a large number of contributors in the ironic community. * Many of these details would need need to be worked out prior to the first part of the existing ironic meeting for the weekly status update. The update being a summary of the status of each sub team. With that having been said, I'm curious if we could re-use the ironic-neutron meeting time slot  for this effort. That meeting was cancelled just after the first of this year . In it's place I think we should have a general purpose integration meeting, that could be used as a standing meeting, specifically reserved at this time for Boot from Volume work, but could be also by any integration effort that needs time to sync-up in advance of the existing meeting. -Julia  http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/irc-meetings/tree/meetings/ironic-neutron-integration-meeting.yaml  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109536.html __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev