Hi Iwamoto, You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API compatibility reasons.
Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwam...@valinux.co.jp>wrote: > At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900, > Itsuro ODA wrote: > > > > Hi Eugene, > > > > Thank you for the response. > > > > I have a comment. > > I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource > > and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple > > driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. > > There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but, > to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the > same. > Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource? > > > What do you think ? > > > > I'm looking forward to your code up ! > > > > Thanks. > > Itsuro Oda > > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400 > > Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Itsuro, > > > > > > I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that > illustrate > > > proposed API. > > > Please see the updated page: > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eugene. > > -- > IWAMOTO Toshihiro > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
