On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Julien Danjou wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > >> +1 for just pulling it under the oslo umbrella but not renaming it. As > >> much as I like the uniformity oslo.keymanager would bring, I think it's > >> already adopted well enough we just want to make it clear that it is > >> blessed and ok to adopt. > > > > I don't even get why moving it under the Oslo umbrella is a win. > > > > What's the current problem people are trying to solve here? > > It's a governance problem. Basically if the abstraction layer is under > the control of the same group as one of the drivers, it's not really an > abstraction layer, and nobody will adopt it or develop another driver > for it. > > See Clint's first answer in the thread for a more detailed explanation. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > Can the Castellan team be broken out into a new project under the big tent rather than having to go under oslo? Oslo as a catch-all made more sense before the big tent. Also, I always thought part of the deal of moving under oslo is that oslo core reviewers have +2 authority on the repos, but it doesn't look like that's part of the proposal here which was a rename and now is changing launchpad to make Castellan a subproject under oslo (along with some documentation changes). - Brant
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
