On 03/20/2017 11:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > After a lot of talk within the Gnocchi team, it appeared to us that > Gnocchi, which has been wisely tagged as 'independent' since its > inception
I'm not sure I find this decision as fine as you do. > has a lot of potential usage outside of OpenStack directly. Any example? > Being part of the big tent helped the project to be built, but it now > appears that it restrains its adoption and contribution from users > outside of the OpenStack realm. Why? > Therefore, the Gnocchi team has decided to move the project outside of > the OpenStack Big Tent. As a first step, a patch has been submitted to > the governance to delist the project from Telemetry: > > https://review.openstack.org/447438 > > As a second step, the project will likely move out of the OpenStack > infrastructure in the future. Of course, this is only the voice of an outsider, "only" doing the packaging of the finalized code, so excuse me if it sounds like I don't understand anything (probably it's the case). But... I really don't understand why the Telemetry team insists in being release-independent, out of big tent and such, when the reality is that all of released Telemetry components are *very tightly* bound to a specific versions of OpenStack. IMO, it doesn't make sense upstream, or downstream of Telemetry. Now, having Gnocchi out of the OpenStack infra is to me a step in the wrong direction. We should aim at full integration with the rest of OpenStack, not getting out. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev