Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com> writes: > On 22 March 2017 at 15:02, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: > >> Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > >> > I suppose Barbican doesn't meet those requirements either, then, yes? >> >> Right -- we don't want to require another service or tie Zuul to an >> authn/authz system for a fundamental feature. However, I do think we >> can look at making integration with Barbican and similar systems an >> option for folks who have such an installation and prefer to use it. >> >> -Jim >> > > Sounds like you're going to make this plugable, is that a hard requirement > that will be added to the spec? or just a possibility?
More of a possibility at this point. In general, I'd like to off-load interaction with other systems to Ansible as much as possible, and then add minimal backing support in Zuul itself if needed, that way the core of Zuul doesn't become a choke point. -Jim __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
