I mentioned that in a meeting today but for greater visibility... This change in how we gate against LTS raises a question whether what we claim in: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402940/4/reference/project-testing-interface.rst is still valid. The wording of the document is such that suggests we test against LTS, and with the UCA adoption in gate, that will no longer be true. I am not against the change per se, I just want the decision to be thought through and advertised to consumers beyond tight circle of upstream developers.
Ihar On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Clark Boylan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017, at 04:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Are we going to keep some job not using the archive, to make sure we >> don't >> break people using packages from LTS? Maybe just periodic/non-voting >> would >> be enough to keep it working on older packages. > > Old stable branches will continue to run against the base LTS release. > But considering that this is how users of Ubuntu get newer packages, the > deployment projects are using it for newer branches, and we know that > the base LTS is broken, I'm not sure how much benefit there would be to > keep testing on the base LTS if we make the switch. > > Its important to note that anyone using base LTS is broken and we know > this because of our testing. > > Clark > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
