Hey folks, In today’s Kolla team meeting, the idea was proposed of adopting nova’s “protocore” mentorship program for Kolla. We would like to know what nova has learned from this effort.
In today’s Kolla meeting we had broad consensus on the following: 1) Kolla has participants that want to be core reviewers 2) These participants don’t know how to become core reviewers 3) The core reviewers in Kolla should mentor “protocore” reviewers on how to do good reviews From that, we concluded some form of mentorship program for potential core reviewers was in order. We got into some debate about _how_ the program should be rolled out. Let’s use this thread to discuss how it should be rolled out since that seems to be the sticking point of the discussion. I saw no dissent in the discussion that the basic concepts were a negative change. I am aware that nova uses a +1 review from a “protocore” and a +2/+w from a core reviewer prior to merge. Nova cores – would you mind defining your process (on the ml is fine) more thoroughly and your experiences so we can learn from you? All kolla contributors, feel free to debate the *how* such a mentorship program should be rolled out. I think we have a lot to learn from our peers in the OpenStack community and learning from their experiences may be helpful. Regards -steve
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
