Please see the below output from the Intel Experimental CI (from
https://review.openstack.org/414769):
On 04/17/2017 01:28 PM, Intel Experimental CI (Code Review) wrote:
Intel Experimental CI has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: placement: SRIOV PF devices as child providers
......................................................................
Patch Set 17:
Build succeeded (check pipeline).
- tempest-dsvm-full-nfv-xenial
http://intel-openstack-ci-logs.ovh/portland/2017-04-17/414769/17/check/tempest-dsvm-full-nfv-xenial/1bcdb64
: FAILURE in 38m 34s (non-voting)
- tempest-dsvm-intel-nfv-xenial
http://intel-openstack-ci-logs.ovh/portland/2017-04-17/414769/17/check/tempest-dsvm-intel-nfv-xenial/a21d879
: FAILURE in 40m 00s (non-voting)
- tempest-dsvm-multinode-ovsdpdk-nfv-networking-xenial
http://intel-openstack-ci-logs.ovh/portland/2017-04-17/414769/17/check/tempest-dsvm-multinode-ovsdpdk-nfv-networking-xenial/837e59d
: FAILURE in 47m 45s (non-voting)
As you can see, it says the build succeeded, but all three jobs in the
pipeline failed.
Is someone actively looking into this particular 3rd party CI system?
Best,
-jay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
