On 20/04/17 01:32 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Wasn't there also some decision made in austin (?) about how we as a > group stated something along the line of co-installability isn't as > important as it once was (and may not even be practical or what people > care about anymore anyway)? > > With kolla becoming more popular (tripleo I think is using it, and ...) > and the containers it creates making isolated per-application > environments it makes me wonder what of global-requirements is still > valid (as a concept) and what isn't. > > I do remember the days of free for all requirements (or requirements > sometimes just put/stashed in devstack vs elsewhere), which I don't > really want to go back to; but if we finally all agree that > co-installability isn't what people actually do and/or care about > (anymore?) then maybe we can re-think some things?
agree with all of ^... but i imagine to make progress on this, we'd have to change/drop devstack usage in gate and that will take forever and a lifetime (is that a chick flick title?) given how embedded devstack is in everything. it seems like the solution starts with devstack. cheers, -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev